First and foremost, webpages that run entirely in Flash present accessibility and usability problems. They are often difficult to keep updated regularly due to the amount of time it takes to modify the Flash pages. Another problem with Flash web pages is that it’s difficult to point someone to specific content. For example, with one of the web pages I’m going to review today, there are several impressive student videos that I would like to show a friend. However, there is no way for me to link to the specific video. I cannot bookmark internal sites. I can only say to a friend “click on the main page, then click the second tab, then click student's work, then it’s the third video from the bottom.” This is contrary to the shared emphasis of Web 2.0. It makes it difficult to connect other users to the information.
There is no denying the artistic elements of Flash oriented webpages. The best example of this is the homepage of the Bellecour Schools of Art in France. The website is absolutely beautiful, with original artwork. The designer uses the screen like a canvas to showcase the art. Content is almost secondary.
The page is divided into three separate sections, each for a different one of the schools. Each school has it’s own color coding for the text and navigation bar that run

The overall effect of the design is to produce a web page that is more like a piece of art or a movie that the user experiences. When I clicked on the little cell phone/pda object in the left hand corner for more information, I was given a treat as the object grew in size and floated to the center of the screen. Then I was given a form to fill out for more information about the school. It is functional and interesting, but if I was a potential student, I have no way to print out relevant information, cut and paste important info, or bookmark specific pages for later.
The target audience for the Bellecour site is students looking for a school. It is in the school’s best interest to showcase the kind of things the students could be learning within its walls. At the same time, the website for the school is a piece of art, a beautiful site for the average web user to discover.
The colors used are on the warmer side – green, blue and orange in lighter tones. The typography is highly readable. And despite the fact that this web page has little in common with standard navigation schemes, I was able to click through and find my way through even before I discovered there was an English version of the site available.
I’d like to compare the above site with the official website of J.K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter novels. Rowling’s official page is also done entirely in Adobe Flash. However, unlike Bellacour, she offers many different options for viewing, including a text only version as well as an accessibility enabled version. The version I am going to speak about is the standard Flash only page available in English. As per my original complaint, I can’t link you to it, I can just tell you to go here and click “Enter Site” under the British Flag.

Navigating through Rowling’s site is more like playing a game than finding information. The experience changes depending on what item you click on. Clicking on the hairbrush, for example, will take you to a bulletin board, where you can click on other items. To get back to the main page, you need to find the hairbrush again. This fits into the Navigating through Rowling’s site is more like playing a game than finding information. TheHarry Potter theme of “portkeys” – objects transporting people magically to different locations.

The ty

Rowling’s site differs from the Bellacour site in many ways. Her site is more entertaining, less focused on presenting beautiful artwork. Her navigation scheme is non-conventional. Although the site gives the impression of a cluttered desk, the items are carefully placed and arranged for the best effect. Both sites make effective use of Adobe Flash to create interesting, beautiful and usable websites targeted to their specific audiences.
No comments:
Post a Comment